A critical reading of the orders, regulations, memoranda and press releases: questions, not verdicts. Each question has its evidence (a link to its place in the text), its method, its confidence, its status and its conclusion. All questions in one file: all.csv
Orders with no Arabic text in the archive, by month
The pattern is clear in the archive: 2 of 64 before April 2004 against 25 of 35 after. Only the absence from the archive is established; the orders among them have an Arabic transcription from the Dorar al-Iraq legal wiki, taken from the Iraqi Official Gazette.
The final legislative rush
Orders by month. 21 orders in May–June 2004, a rate of 2.5 a week against 1.6 before; 17 have no Arabic text in the archive, and 10 address the period after the handover in their text.
Shortest Arabic texts relative to the English
Arabic length as a percentage of the English (archive-wide median close to 100%). The difference may come from OCR, an incomplete file or another version of the order.
Orders most cited by “amending” orders
Number of later orders with “Amend” in their title that cite the order.
Questions by confidence
Established: the fact is written in the document. Likely: a strong automatic inference. Doubtful: may be an extraction artefact. Open: cannot be answered from the archive alone.
The map of power in the orders’ language (orders per month)
| Apr 03 | May 03 | Jun 03 | Jul 03 | Aug 03 | Sep 03 | Oct 03 | Nov 03 | Dec 03 | Jan 04 | Feb 04 | Mar 04 | Apr 04 | May 04 | Jun 04 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrator’s powers | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Overriding Iraqi law | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Immunity clauses | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
| Penalty clauses | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| Consultation with Iraqis | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
Number of orders whose English text contains each kind of wording, month by month (of 99 orders with English text).
Shifts in discourse: share of documents using each term (%)
| Apr 03 | May 03 | Jun 03 | Jul 03 | Aug 03 | Sep 03 | Oct 03 | Nov 03 | Dec 03 | Jan 04 | Feb 04 | Mar 04 | Apr 04 | May 04 | Jun 04 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| occupation / occupying power — الاحتلال | 2 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 21 | |||
| liberation — التحرير | 7 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 12 | |
| sovereignty — السيادة | 7 | 2 | 28 | 10 | 28 | 13 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 31 | 39 | 46 | |||
| terrorists — الإرهابيون | 8 | 8 | 20 | 34 | 24 | 25 | 14 | 11 | 18 | 25 | 26 | 23 | 39 | ||
| insurgents — المتمردون | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 3 | 11 | |||||||
| former regime elements — فلول النظام | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 9 | ||||
| anti-Iraqi forces — القوى المعادية للعراق | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||
| foreign fighters — المقاتلون الأجانب | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 8 |
Percentage of the month’s documents (excluding contracts, budget, military training and miscellany) that use the term in English or Arabic. Briefings include journalists’ questions.
Figures stated in releases and briefings (strict patterns)
- 8 Aug 2003Briefing34,000 police · current — “ce force participated in repression by the state. Right now there are almost 34,000 Iraqi police on the streets. Of these, over 4,500, p”
- 24 Aug 2003Briefingover 40,000 police · current — “as fired from his job. He's a very brave man, and he is now heading up more than 40,000 police who are on duty, Iraqi police who are o”
- 26 Aug 2003Briefing40,000 police · current — “we basically had to create a new police force. We’ve now got 40,000 Iraqi police serving already all across the country, we inte”
- 31 Aug 2003Briefing300 MW · at liberation — “ecurity services did not trust you with mobile telephones. At the time of liberation, Iraq produced only 300 megawatts of electricity daily Today Iraq”
- 31 Aug 2003Briefingover 1 million barrels a day · current — “than 7.5 billion dinars in wages. Right now Iraqi workers are producing over 1 million barrels of oil per day. · All the money receiv”
- 3 Sep 2003Briefing37,000 police · current — “single policeman in the country. There was no rule of law. Today we have 37,000 police. We have 49 of the 151 prisons reopened”
- 19 Sep 2003Briefing34,000 police · current — “ts of justice? The Coalition has worked hard to ensure that 34,000 Iraqi police officers are now on the streets. And there are plans to increase the n”
- 23 Sep 2003Briefing40,000 police · current — “nd a communications network to link it all together. Already 40,000 police are on duty. Our plan will double this number in th”
- 9 Oct 2003Releaseover 40,000 police · current — “Iraqi Minister of Interior Nori Badran. Iraq currently has more than 40,000 police on duty throughout the country. The new facili”
- 17 Nov 2003Briefing2.2 million barrels a day · current — “: We continue to ramp up oil production and oil exports. We are producing approximately 2.2 million barrels a day, exporting just north of 1 millio”
- 19 Nov 2003Briefing2.2 million barrels a day · current — “ng domestic oil needs right now? MR. SENOR: Right now Iraq is producing approximately 2.2 million barrels per day. Iraq is exporting over 1 milli”
- 20 Nov 2003Briefing2.2 million barrels a day · current — “ng domestic oil needs right now? MR. SENOR: Right now Iraq is producing approximately 2.2 million barrels per day. Iraq is exporting over 1 milli”
- 1 Feb 2004Briefingover 60,000 police · current — “ived here, there were no Iraqi police on the streets, today there are over 60,000 Iraqi police on the streets. Certainly the presence”
- 2 Feb 2004Briefing8,000 police · current — “-- we just graduated a class of police from the academy -- we have almost 8,000 police. We'll have 10,000 by May, and 19,000 b”
- 10 Feb 2004Briefingover 70,000 police · current — “i police patrols. Here we are, some nine months later, and there are over 70,000 Iraqi police on the street. Could they improve? Shou”
- 1 May 2004Briefing2.5 million barrels a day · current — “cture is being rebuilt, with the Iraqi oil industry already producing about 2.5 million barrels per day. On the ground in Iraq, we hav”
- 20 May 2004Briefing300 MW · at liberation — “e exceeded prewar levels in terms of electrical generation. When we arrived here, Iraq was generating something like 300 megawatts of power a day. And”
- 24 May 2004Briefing4,200–4,400 MW · pre-war — “mmer. This summer we will be generating somewhere near the pre-war levels -- the prewar levels were 4,200 to 4,400 megawatts a day. We are now generat”
- 27 May 2004Briefingover 2 million barrels a day · current — “fic details to the Iraqi oil ministry -- but Iraq right now is producing well over 2 million barrels per day that -- or exceeded prewar leve”
- 9 Jun 2004Briefing2.4 million barrels a day · pre-war — “rget of the enemy. In recent months, production reached the prewar level of about 2.4 million barrels a day. Under Saddam, the revenue from t”
- 28 Jun 2004Release4400 MW · pre-war — “at was used to achieve the Coalitionís goal of reaching the pre-war level of 4400 MWís of electricity was called the ì4400 M”
Each figure with its sentence. Only like is compared with like: the same measure (serving, production, generation) and the same kind.
Periods with no order, regulation or memorandum (21 days or more)
Days between two consecutive dated numbered documents in the archive.
Translation gap 2
We compare each order’s Arabic and English texts: overall length (the archive-wide median is close to 1:1), and amounts written with thousands separators in English that do not appear in the Arabic, nor as millions or thousands. Almost all Arabic text is OCR, so most of these questions stay “doubtful” until checked against the original.
- Order 64The Arabic text in the archive is only 29% of the English length: is the translation incomplete, or is the preserved Arabic file partial?Doubtful · 29 February 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 75Amounts in the English text that do not appear in the Arabic: 1,300. Were they dropped in translation or by OCR?Doubtful · 15 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
No Arabic text 27
Orders with no Arabic text in our archive (University of North Texas Libraries and the Internet Archive). We compare their share before and after April 2004. What is established is only the absence from the archive, not that no Arabic text was issued: the orders among them now have an Arabic transcription from the Dorar al-Iraq legal wiki, which states that it reproduces the Iraqi Official Gazette; the Gazette issues in which they were published have not been found.
- Order 16There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 4 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 32There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 9 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 59There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 1 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 67There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 21 March 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 69There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 1 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 70There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 3 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 72There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 10 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 74There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 18 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 76There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 20 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 78There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 19 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 79There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 19 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 80There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 26 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 81There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 26 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 82There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 28 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 83There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 29 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 86There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 19 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 87There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 14 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 88There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 12 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 89There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 30 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 90There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 28 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 91There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 2 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 93There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 2 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 94There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 6 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 95There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 2 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 98There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 99There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 100There is no Arabic text of this order in the archive. Was it issued in Arabic in the Iraqi Official Gazette (al-Waqa’i al-Iraqiya)?Established by the text · 28 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
The final legislative rush 10
Orders dated 1 May – 28 June 2004, and their weekly rate compared with earlier months; we search their English text for wording that extends their effect beyond the handover (remain in force, Iraqi Interim Government, after the transfer of authority…). The wording is established by the text; its legal meaning is a question.
- Order 17Issued on 2004-06-27, 1 day before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 72Issued on 2004-06-10, 18 days before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 10 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 76Issued on 2004-05-20, 39 days before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Following the transfer of governmental authority”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 20 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 91Issued on 2004-06-02, 26 days before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 2 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 92Issued on 2004-05-31, 28 days before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 31 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 95Issued on 2004-06-02, 26 days before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 2 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 96Issued on 2004-06-07, 21 days before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 7 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 98Issued on 2004-06-27, 1 day before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 99Issued on 2004-06-27, 1 day before the handover, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“Iraqi Interim Government”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 100Issued on 2004-06-28, on the day of the handover itself, and its text addresses the period after the handover (“until rescinded or amended”). What of it remained in force after 28 June 2004?Established by the text · 28 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
References and amendments 1
From machine-read references: orders that cite a number missing from the archive, and orders that more than one later order amends in so many words (is amended, amendment to, replaced…). Reference reading is automatic and can misfire on OCR text.
- Order 38It is cited by 2 later orders whose titles contain “Amend” (Order 47, Order 70). Which version of it was in force at the handover?Likely · 9 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
Date and text integrity 21
We compare the official code date in the Arabic and English texts and across a document’s copies, and against the earliest preserved file date (including Internet Archive captures); we flag files whose names describe them as revised or amended, and orders without a readable dated code.
- Order 3The preserved Arabic copies carry codes with different dates (2003-05-23, 2003-12-31). Are they amended versions of the same document?Established by the text · 31 December 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 3The preserved English copies carry codes with different dates (2003-05-23, 2003-12-31). Are they amended versions of the same document?Established by the text · 31 December 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 9The preserved English copies carry codes with different dates (2003-06-08, 2004-06-27). Are they amended versions of the same document?Established by the text · 8 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 10The earliest preserved file is dated 2003-06-05, before the document’s official date (2003-06-08). Is the file date a metadata error, or does the file have another story?Doubtful · 8 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 13A preserved file is named as a revised or amended version (Revised / Amended). Is the original text before the amendment preserved, and what changed?Established by the text · 18 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 15No readable dated code in the text; the date shown comes from the file’s publication date and is approximate. What is the actual signing date?Open question · 23 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 16The preserved English copies carry codes with different dates (2003-06-26, 2003-12-01, 2004-06-04). Are they amended versions of the same document?Established by the text · 4 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 17The preserved Arabic text carries a code dated 2003-06-26 and the English one a code dated 2004-06-27, and the Arabic is 22% of the English length. Are these two different versions of the document (original and amended)? Which Arabic text was issued for the other version?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 17The preserved English copies carry codes with different dates (2003-06-26, 2004-06-27). Are they amended versions of the same document?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 20The preserved English copies carry codes with different dates (2003-07-14, 2003-07-17). Are they amended versions of the same document?Established by the text · 17 July 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 21No readable dated code in the text; the date shown comes from the file’s publication date and is approximate. What is the actual signing date?Open question · 6 August 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 32No readable dated code in the text; the date shown comes from the file’s publication date and is approximate. What is the actual signing date?Open question · 9 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 35No readable dated code in the text; the date shown comes from the file’s publication date and is approximate. What is the actual signing date?Open question · 21 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 35A preserved file is named as a revised or amended version (Revised / Amended). Is the original text before the amendment preserved, and what changed?Established by the text · 21 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Regulation 3The preserved Arabic text carries a code dated 2003-06-03 and the English one a code dated 2003-06-18. Are these two different versions of the document (original and amended)? Which Arabic text was issued for the other version?Established by the text · 18 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Regulation 5The preserved Arabic text carries a code dated 2003-08-17 and the English one a code dated 2003-06-18. Are these two different versions of the document (original and amended)? Which Arabic text was issued for the other version?Established by the text · 18 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Regulation 5The preserved Arabic copies carry codes with different dates (2003-06-18, 2003-08-17). Are they amended versions of the same document?Established by the text · 18 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Regulation 8No readable dated code in the text; the date shown comes from the file’s publication date and is approximate. What is the actual signing date?Open question · 14 January 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Memorandum 3The earliest preserved file is dated 2003-08-06, before the document’s official date (2004-06-27). Is the file date a metadata error, or does the file have another story?Doubtful · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Memorandum 3A preserved file is named as a revised or amended version (Revised / Amended). Is the original text before the amendment preserved, and what changed?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Memorandum 15No readable dated code in the text; the date shown comes from the file’s publication date and is approximate. What is the actual signing date?Open question · 18 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
The map of power in the orders’ language 21
In each order’s English text we count: the Administrator’s powers (“the Administrator may/shall”), “notwithstanding” clauses that place the text above other law, immunity clauses, penalty clauses, and consultation with the Governing Council or the Iraqi government. The counts are established by the text; their meaning is a question.
- Order 3It contains immunity clauses (1 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 31 December 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 17It contains immunity clauses (9 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 20The Administrator retains powers in 4 places (“the Administrator may/shall…”). What was kept out of Iraqi institutions’ hands?Established by the text · 17 July 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 23It contains immunity clauses (1 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 7 August 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 27It contains immunity clauses (1 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 4 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 28It contains immunity clauses (1 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 3 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 40It contains immunity clauses (3 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 19 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 48It contains immunity clauses (2 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 9 December 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 53It places its text above Iraqi law in force with “notwithstanding” in 1 place (“Notwithstanding any other provision of law…”). Which laws did it set aside, and did that survive the handover?Established by the text · 16 January 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 56It contains immunity clauses (4 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 1 March 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 64It places its text above Iraqi law in force with “notwithstanding” in 2 places (“notwithstanding anything to the contrary in The Law…”). Which laws did it set aside, and did that survive the handover?Established by the text · 29 February 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 69It places its text above Iraqi law in force with “notwithstanding” in 2 places (“notwithstanding any existing salary scales…”). Which laws did it set aside, and did that survive the handover?Established by the text · 1 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 71It places its text above Iraqi law in force with “notwithstanding” in 1 place (“Notwithstanding existing…”). Which laws did it set aside, and did that survive the handover?Established by the text · 6 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 73It contains immunity clauses (1 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 22 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 74It places its text above Iraqi law in force with “notwithstanding” in 2 places (“Notwithstanding any provisions of the Banking Law…”). Which laws did it set aside, and did that survive the handover?Established by the text · 18 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 75The Administrator retains powers in 4 places (“the Administrator may/shall…”). What was kept out of Iraqi institutions’ hands?Established by the text · 15 April 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 76It contains immunity clauses (2 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 20 May 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 94It contains immunity clauses (2 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 6 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 98It places its text above Iraqi law in force with “notwithstanding” in 1 place (“Notwithstanding any provision of law…”). Which laws did it set aside, and did that survive the handover?Established by the text · 27 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 100It places its text above Iraqi law in force with “notwithstanding” in 1 place (“Notwithstanding any provision of this Order or any other law…”). Which laws did it set aside, and did that survive the handover?Established by the text · 28 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Order 100It contains immunity clauses (2 mentions). Who is granted immunity, from which jurisdiction, and until when?Established by the text · 28 June 2004Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
Figures versus claims 1
From press releases and briefings we extract recurring national figures (megawatts, police numbers, million barrels of oil a day) and classify them automatically as a target, a baseline (“pre-war”, “at liberation”) or a current figure. We ask when the same baseline changes, or when the current figure falls between close statements. The figures are established by the text; whether they measure the same thing is a question.
- BriefingIraqi police — serving: between 2003-08-08 and 2003-09-23 the statements give figures that rise and fall: 34,000 → 40,000 → 37,000 → 34,000 → 40,000 police. Which is authoritative, and why did it change?Likely · 23 September 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
Shifts in discourse 8
For each month we measure the share of documents that use a term (in English or Arabic) out of all that month’s documents, so that a rise in volume is not mistaken for a shift in vocabulary. First appearance in the archive is not first use in reality. Transcripts include journalists’ questions, so a term in a transcript is not always the CPA’s own word.
- GOV-de8dfdc6“occupation / occupying power — الاحتلال”: first appears in the archive on 2003-05-13, and the share of documents using it rose from 3.3% a month in 2003 to 8.5% in 2004. What changed in the official discourse, and when?Likely · 13 May 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- DAI-5659e115“liberation — التحرير”: first appears in the archive on 2003-05-08, and the share of documents using it stayed similar (7.1% in 2003, 8.1% in 2004). What changed in the official discourse, and when?Open question · 8 May 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Release“sovereignty — السيادة”: first appears in the archive on 2003-07-09, and the share of documents using it rose from 11.0% a month in 2003 to 31.3% in 2004. What changed in the official discourse, and when?Likely · 9 July 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- PN-9ef54b1a“terrorists — الإرهابيون”: first appears in the archive on 2003-06-17, and the share of documents using it stayed similar (16.6% in 2003, 23.9% in 2004). What changed in the official discourse, and when?Open question · 17 June 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Briefing“insurgents — المتمردون”: first appears in the archive on 2003-11-17, and the share of documents using it rose from 1.4% a month in 2003 to 6.6% in 2004. What changed in the official discourse, and when?Likely · 17 November 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- DAI-b9eb1d6f“former regime elements — فلول النظام”: first appears in the archive on 2003-08-27, and the share of documents using it stayed similar (2.6% in 2003, 4.6% in 2004). What changed in the official discourse, and when?Open question · 27 August 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Briefing“anti-Iraqi forces — القوى المعادية للعراق”: first appears in the archive on 2003-12-04, and the share of documents using it rose from 0.1% a month in 2003 to 0.6% in 2004. What changed in the official discourse, and when?Likely · 4 December 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
- Briefing“foreign fighters — المقاتلون الأجانب”: first appears in the archive on 2003-08-24, and the share of documents using it rose from 2.1% a month in 2003 to 5.6% in 2004. What changed in the official discourse, and when?Likely · 24 August 2003Status: Open · Conclusion: not written yet
Silences 1
Periods with no dated order, regulation or memorandum in the archive (21 days or more), numbered documents that other documents cite but we do not hold, and topics present in press releases but rare in the orders. Absence from the archive does not mean non-existence.