النص مستخرج آلياً من صورة الوثيقة أو من ملف قديم، وقد يحتوي أخطاء في بعض الكلمات أو ترتيب الأسطر. الملف الأصلي هو المرجع.
PS/CDI
Sec(Iraq)-AD Pol/Ops
MA/C.JO
Cabinet Office - Desmond Bowen FCO - Head of IPU Policy Director FCO - William Ehrman Legal Adviser OP TELIC - DRAFT OPERATIONAL CONCEPT FOR PHASE 4.
Issue
The draft operational concept for UK forces in Op TELIC, Phase 4, accepted by COS on Monday and our concerns about ORHA Recommendation 2 That the Secretary of State:
a.
Note that on Monday the COS yesterday endorsed a paper by CJO recommending that in Phase IV:
i.
UK Forces' linkage with Iraqis should reflect their system of governance and should thus be arranged on a provincial basis.
UK forces should use the Joint Commission model.
ii.
ill.
Forces should be deployed on an intelligence led rather than framework basis with emphasis on indicators and warning and mobility iv.
The Chiefs of Staff should take a view, in due course, on the geographical area that the UK should cover;
b.
Note that while the "Joint Commission" concept is well proven in the Balkans, its application will be adapted to the particular circumstances of Iraq DEGLAGSIEIED
vir Kumsteld to suggest a pragmatic way ahead (speaking notes attached).
Timing
3.
Urgent in respect of the phone call, timed for 1500 on 3 April.
Background
4
To a degree, initial "Phase IV" operations have already begun in Iraq with humanitarian assistance and low level civil contacts being conducted by UK forces. There is thus a pressing need to define an operational concept for the employment of UK forces in early Phase IV operations in Iraq. Reference A.
recommends the "Joint Commission" (As employed in the Balkans this is essentially a committee structure with UK military and local civil members that serves as a joint decision making structure).
5
It is. however, early days. The strategic background to Phase 4 operations remains uncertain and changeable. Very significant decisions - e.g.
about Iraqi governance and the legal basis for Phase IV operations - remain to be taken. How any "Joint Commissions" will relate to Iraqi governance structures operations-re structures remains undecided; care will be required that their establishment does not pre- ache the deing the merits of varai Comtission' model, we also need to be sympathetic to Iraqi culture and wishes. Commanders on the ground are already The key point is that implementing what has been called a "town hall" process.
"Joint Commissions" should not become an alien imposition or, in any way, a rival power base to an Interim Authority; their role should be obviously temporary and advisory The precise tasks that will fall to UK forces in Phase IV remain to be determined. These will depend very largely on the circumstances that obtain at the end of Phase Ill (the degree of permissiveness, the extent to which governance and other Iraqi structures remain etc). It is thus not currently possible to make a firm determination of the final geographic scope of UK DECEASSIAED
8. The conditions for such a deployment are not yet right at many levels:
-
there is no prospect (following Camp David) of early adoption of a 'fourth' UN resolution endorsing arrangements for post-conflict Iraq;
to deploy what will be seen as the precursor body for such arrangements now would look like pre-emption;
the composition of the political wing of ORHA and of the associated State Interim Iraqi Authority is still the subject of Department/DOD rivalry;
the de facto authority in most of SE Iraq is UK 1 Div, albeit subordinated to the US land component commander; the relationship of GOC 1 Div to ORHA is not clear, though preliminary contacts have been warm.
the pressing tasks on the ground are humanitarian and low-level administration (eg opening schools and hospitals); the political baggage that ORHA carries may be counterproductive to our efforts to win the confidence of local people.
In the light of this (particularly the timing mentioned above) it would be helpful if the Secretary of State could raise the issue in a call with Mr Rumsfeld The attached speaking note seeks to address the issue in a positive spirit, though the final bullets sound a stiffer note of warning, if required Ian Lee IAN LEE DG Op Pol Enclosure:
DEGIASSFIED
struck by the success of 'local' and 'prototyping' approach we've taken to clearing villages and towns (Al Zabayr) while developing situation in Basra Don't believe the situation is ready in (our bit of) Iraq for all dimensions of ORHA but a 'toe in the water' or prototyping with the humanitarian and initial reconstruction elements could be very helpful;
End state we're looking for is a supportive high-consent population so that we can get forces out and allow Iraqis to run their own affairs;
getting the transitional arrangements right is vital for this.
President and Prime Minister agreed to a 'softly softly' approach on the big political questions about Phase IV and the form of UN endorsement and involvement; ORHA big bang would run counter to that:
Concerned about how it would relate to (destabilise?) our UK 1 Div effort:
UK needs UNSCR both for legal reasons and because a UNSCR delivers more military partners for burden-sharing and an exit strategy;
we are still old Europeans too!
DECduASSAFIED