1
EstablishedThe fund was Iraqi money: 54% of its receipts were oil revenue, 39% the Oil-for-Food surplus and 5% Iraqi assets frozen abroad.
Reading Lab · Dossier 9
Between May 2003 and June 2004 the Development Fund for Iraq received $20.94 billion, 99% of it Iraqi money: oil, Oil-for-Food surplus and frozen assets. The CPA paid out $14.29 billion of it before leaving, most in its last six months. In the same weeks only about 2% of the $18.4 billion Congress appropriated for reconstruction had been spent.
The fund was Iraqi money: 54% of its receipts were oil revenue, 39% the Oil-for-Food surplus and 5% Iraqi assets frozen abroad.
Two speeds: by 28 June 2004 the CPA had paid out 68% of what entered the Iraqi fund. Of the US reconstruction fund ($18.4 billion), only $458 million — 2.5% — had been spent by 13 July, according to the Congressional record, and 2.1% according to the CPA Inspector General.
The rush at the end: $1.82 billion was paid in the first seven months (May–December 2003) and $12.47 billion in the last six (January–28 June 2004), about 7 times as much.
June 2004 alone: $3.43 billion transferred to the Ministry of Finance and the Kurdistan Regional Government. The report says June transfers were larger than earlier months “to ensure the Interim Government of Iraq had sufficient funds to meet obligations subsequent to the transfer of authority”. (The June split between the two comes from column order in damaged OCR; the total matches.)
$5.14 billion was paid for projects the CPA itself administered on behalf of Iraqi ministries, $4.89 billion of it in 2004.
$0.73 billion in letters of credit through JP Morgan, 60% of it for the Ministry of Trade (food).
The auditor could not confirm that all exported oil reached the fund: “the internal control systems over the Iraqi oil industry were not sufficient to ensure the completeness of export sales”, and the gap could not be quantified. How much oil was sold outside the fund? The documents do not say.
2003 receipts are 10,307,494 thousand dollars in the first report and 10,288,819 in the comparison column of the 2004 report: a difference of 18,675 thousand that our copy does not explain.
Source: the two statements of cash receipts and payments of the Development Fund for Iraq, audited by KPMG for the International Advisory and Monitoring Board: 22 May – 31 December 2003 (AUD-8546a576) and 1 January – 28 June 2004 (AUD-089588e6). All amounts are in thousands of dollars, as in the statements.
Extraction: figures were transcribed by hand from the two documents. The 2004 payment lines are damaged in the machine-extracted text, so we rebuilt them from the notes (monthly transfers to ministries; letters of credit by ministry) and checked that they sum to the printed total (12,472,162) and that the closing balance matches the printed one (6,647,736). The full file with every source: dfi_sources_uses.json.
The US comparison: $18.4 billion appropriated by Congress for the reconstruction fund (IRRF) in November 2003. Spending figures are from the CPA Inspector General’s report to Congress (30 July 2004) and a Congressional hearing record (22 July 2004, citing 13 July figures). “Obligated” means contracted; “expended” means actually paid.
Limits: this file covers the Iraqi fund only; US reconstruction contracts are detailed in oversight reports and are not analysed here yet. The auditor itself could not confirm the completeness of oil revenue. Figures are in current dollars, not adjusted for inflation.