1
EstablishedSummer 2003: 34,000 → 40,000 → 40,000 → 37,000 → 34,000 → 40,000 → 40,000 police “on duty” or “on the streets” in 7 statements over seven weeks. The figure does not rise steadily as one would expect of a force being built.
Reading Lab · Dossier 5
The number of police “on duty” in CPA statements rose and fell from week to week in summer 2003: 34,000 → 40,000 → 40,000 → 37,000 → 34,000 → 40,000 → 40,000. Months later one speaker said 60,000 were on the streets and another, the next day, “almost 8,000”, because he was counting something else.
Summer 2003: 34,000 → 40,000 → 40,000 → 37,000 → 34,000 → 40,000 → 40,000 police “on duty” or “on the streets” in 7 statements over seven weeks. The figure does not rise steadily as one would expect of a force being built.
Two figures two days apart: “over 60,000 Iraqi police on the streets” (1 February 2004), then “we have almost 8,000 police” (2004-02-02) in the context of academy graduates. The two measures differ, and the statements do not distinguish them.
The “pre-war level” of electricity appears with different values: 4,200–4,400, 4400 MW, and “at liberation” 300 MW.
PR-f3b7be6b TR-0ca7efa6 TR-a5f1e8df TR-bf772fc2 Promise and reality →
Do two figures measure the same thing? “On duty” may mean trained, hired or present; the statements do not define the measure.
From press releases and briefings we extract recurring national figures (megawatts, police numbers, million barrels of oil a day) and classify them automatically as a target, a baseline (“pre-war”, “at liberation”) or a current figure. We ask when the same baseline changes, or when the current figure falls between close statements. The figures are established by the text; whether they measure the same thing is a question.